FAA 2026 Staffing Targets: Transfer Winners and Losers
The FAA's new 2026 Controller Workforce Plan changes the staffing picture at nearly every facility in the country. For air traffic controllers considering a transfer, the new CPC targets may make some facilities easier to enter and others easier to leave. No controllers had to certify or leave for the percentages to move. The denominator changed.
That matters for transfers because the same target change can produce both a winner and a loser:
- A higher CPC target lowers the facility's staffing percentage. That can create room for controllers trying to transfer in, but it can make it harder for controllers already there to be released.
- A lower CPC target raises the facility's staffing percentage. That can help controllers trying to transfer out, but it can reduce the need to accept transfers from elsewhere.
This analysis compares the FAA 2026 plan targets with the previously reported CPC targets in the June 2026 staffing data used by ATC Toolkit.
The National Picture
Across the 313 facilities in the dataset:
- 275 facilities received lower targets
- 16 facilities received higher targets
- 22 facilities were unchanged
- The combined target fell from 14,633 to 12,563 CPCs, a reduction of 2,070
The immediate effect is that most facilities now appear more fully staffed. That does not add controllers to the operation, but it can change how a facility is viewed when transfer demand and release eligibility are evaluated.
Winners for Transferring In
Only 16 facilities received higher targets. These are the clearest potential winners for controllers who want to transfer to a facility because their calculated staffing percentages fell.
- Lincoln Tower (LNK): target 12 to 15; staffing 75.0% to 60.0%
- Teterboro Tower (TEB): target 22 to 28; staffing 63.6% to 50.0%
- Chicago O'Hare Tower (ORD): target 73 to 88; staffing 76.7% to 63.6%
- Denver Tower (DEN): target 41 to 47; staffing 73.2% to 63.8%
- Colorado Springs Tower (COS): target 27 to 30; staffing 66.7% to 60.0%
- Kennedy Tower (JFK): target 33 to 36; staffing 78.8% to 72.2%
- San Francisco Tower (SFO): target 30 to 32; staffing 70.0% to 65.6%
- Las Vegas Tower (LAS): target 41 to 43; staffing 80.5% to 76.7%
ORD is the largest absolute increase, adding 15 positions to its target. TEB has the second-largest percentage-point drop among this group, while LNK has the largest drop, falling 15 points.
LAS and Phoenix Tower (PHX) are especially notable because both fell below 80% under the new targets. Controllers interested in these facilities may see more opportunity than the prior numbers suggested.
Losers for Transferring Out
The same facilities are the potential losers for controllers trying to leave. A higher target creates a larger gap to full staffing and can make release conditions harder to satisfy.
This is most significant at facilities that were already below target:
- Teterboro Tower (TEB) now calculates at 50.0%
- Lincoln Tower (LNK) and Colorado Springs Tower (COS) calculate at 60.0%
- Chicago O'Hare Tower (ORD) falls to 63.6%
- Denver Tower (DEN) falls to 63.8%
- San Francisco Tower (SFO) falls to 65.6%
If you work at one of the 16 facilities with an increased target, the new plan is not automatically good news. Your facility may now need more CPCs before it can comfortably release one.
Winners for Transferring Out
Lower targets can produce the opposite result. Many facilities jumped above common staffing benchmarks, and 93 now calculate at 100% or more using their June CPC count and the new target.
The largest percentage changes include:
- Islip Tower (ISP): target 23 to 11; staffing 56.5% to 118.2%
- Gillespie Tower (SEE): target 19 to 11; staffing 78.9% to 136.4%
- Morristown Tower (MMU): target 19 to 10; staffing 63.2% to 120.0%
- DeKalb-Peachtree Tower (PDK): target 22 to 13; staffing 77.3% to 130.8%
- Allentown Tower (ABE): target 37 to 22; staffing 78.4% to 131.8%
- Houston Hooks Tower (DWH): target 19 to 10; staffing 57.9% to 110.0%
- Oakland Tower (OAK): target 35 to 18; staffing 51.4% to 100.0%
- Birmingham Tower (BHM): target 39 to 22; staffing 61.5% to 109.1%
- Westchester Tower (HPN): target 22 to 13; staffing 68.2% to 115.4%
- Des Moines Tower (DSM): target 38 to 20; staffing 50.0% to 95.0%
For controllers waiting for their facility's percentage to improve, these changes may be meaningful. ISP, OAK, BHM, HPN, and DSM did not suddenly gain CPCs; they moved because the FAA substantially reduced their targets.
Big Centers That Now Look Healthier
Several ARTCCs received the largest numerical reductions:
- Cleveland Center (ZOB): target 345 to 274 (-71); staffing 79.7% to 100.4%
- New York TRACON (N90): target 226 to 160 (-66); staffing 50.9% to 71.9%
- Houston Center (ZHU): target 302 to 257 (-45); staffing 85.1% to 100.0%
- Atlanta Center (ZTL): target 343 to 300 (-43); staffing 82.8% to 94.7%
- New York Center (ZNY): target 321 to 281 (-40); staffing 59.8% to 68.3%
- Denver Center (ZDV): target 294 to 260 (-34); staffing 74.1% to 83.8%
- Washington Center (ZDC): target 312 to 281 (-31); staffing 83.3% to 92.5%
- Chicago Center (ZAU): target 321 to 290 (-31); staffing 83.2% to 92.1%
ZOB and ZHU now calculate at roughly 100%, which could materially change their transfer posture. N90 and ZNY improve substantially but remain well below the new targets, so a lower target does not necessarily mean an easy release.
Losers for Transferring In
The broadest group of losers is anyone hoping to transfer into one of the 275 facilities with a reduced target.
Facilities such as SEE, ABE, PDK, OAK, BHM, HPN, and ISP now calculate above 100%. On paper, they may have little reason to select additional CPCs unless anticipated losses, traffic needs, local circumstances, or other staffing considerations create an opening.
This is why the new percentages should be checked before building a transfer list. A facility that looked severely understaffed under the prior reported target may now look fully staffed under the FAA 2026 plan.
What the Numbers Do Not Guarantee
These target changes are important, but they do not guarantee a release or selection. NCEPT outcomes and other transfers depend on the applicable placement rules, projected staffing, anticipated gains and losses, training capacity, facility demand, and the data used for a particular panel.
The FAA describes 12,563 as its full staffing target based on forecast demand and a new staffing model. Until these targets are consistently reflected in official monthly placement data and transfer decisions, they should be treated as a strong directional signal rather than a promise.
Use the ATC Toolkit facility pages and Placement Helper to compare the new FAA target, prior reported target, current CPC staffing, projected staffing, and training conditions for the facilities on your list.
Sources and Methodology
- FAA Air Traffic Controller Workforce Plan 2026-2028
- FAA announcement of the 2026 Controller Workforce Plan
ATC Toolkit calculated staffing percentages by dividing the June 2026 current CPC count, excluding temporary assignments and long-term holds where reported, by each target. Prior percentages use the monthly reported CPC target; new percentages use the FAA 2026 plan target. Percentages are rounded to one decimal place.